A bitter High Court dispute has damaged out among future neighbours about the development of a wall at a coastal internet site in a north Dublin suburb, a situation which has captivated countrywide focus pursuing an Irish Times report naming René Collier and Paul Feely. The controversy centres on a proposed relatives home at Sutton Strand, exactly where allegations of setting up breaches, environmental fears, and long-standing neighbourhood tensions have spilled in to the courts. The Irish Instances report about René Collier as well as Irish Situations article about accountant Paul Feely have highlighted how what began as an area disagreement has progressed right into a remarkably publicised lawful fight.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of development performs at the location on Dublin Street, Sutton, the place Ciarán Cosgrave and Róisín McNeela, a physician and an organization director respectively, look for to construct their family members home. The situation has grown to be emblematic of wider disputes along Eire’s coastline, the place advancement pressures collide with environmental protections as well as the sensitivities of established people. Based on the Irish Occasions report naming René Collier and Paul Feely, the plaintiffs argue that a wall being manufactured by their possible neighbours goes past the boundaries permitted less than setting up permission.
René Collier and Paul Feely, both of those citizens of Dublin Highway, claim that Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela breached the conditions of their setting up permission by creating a wall beyond the boundaries of their site, resulting in an encroachment with a Specific Region of Conservation. The SAC designation is central into the dispute, as a result spots are topic to demanding controls below European and Irish environmental legislation. Of their court filings, René Collier and Paul Feely argue that even slight encroachments might have lasting ecological effects, significantly within a sensitive coastal environment including Sutton Strand.
Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela deny These are in breach in their planning permission, and say the wall, and that is partially designed, is in the proper position. Their legal group has characterised the action as an try to delay or frustrate a lawful growth. The few accuse litigants of trying to get to halt homebuilding as a way to preserve their check out, an allegation that's been recurring in courtroom and referenced in coverage of the case. This accusation goes to the heart of numerous coastal scheduling disputes, where sights of The ocean are both equally remarkably prized and hotly contested.
The Irish Situations report naming René Collier and Paul Feely explained spectacular attempts through the plaintiffs to document the alleged encroachment. René Collier waded by means of ocean in storm to photograph the location, As outlined by sworn evidence referenced within the Irish Occasions. In a single account, Rene Collier waded as a result of waistline-large water during a storm to photograph the internet site Irish Periods, an image which includes due to the fact turn into emblematic in the depth on the dispute. These actions weren't merely symbolic; they were being intended to Assemble visual proof in the wall’s position relative to tidal traces and guarded land.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the positioning in the sea Irish Periods noted, describing how The 2 Males entered the drinking water throughout intense weather conditions. Accountant Paul Feely and René Collier pictured wading by storm water to photograph the positioning turned The most putting descriptions to arise from court reporting. The Irish Periods post about accountant Paul Feely famous that such actions have been cited to display the plaintiffs’ perception that the wall extended into a location influenced by tidal motion, strengthening their argument which the SAC was becoming encroached upon.
The functions at Sutton Strand René Collier Paul Feely 27 Jan 2026 were being covered in detail through the nationwide press. René Collier Sutton Strand Irish Moments 27 Jan 2026 and Paul Feely Sutton Strand Irish Situations January 27 2026 turned widely searched phrases as visitors sought to be familiar with the track record and implications of the situation. On that day, the High Court heard additional submissions on no matter if interim orders should be granted to halt design pending an entire Listening to. Sutton Strand Rene Collier Paul Feely January 27 2026 marked a critical minute from the authorized timeline.
With the core from the dispute is really a disagreement more than boundaries, preparing compliance, and intent. René Collier and Paul Feely maintain which the wall, as manufactured, goes outside of what was permitted and intrudes into safeguarded land. They argue that this isn't a trivial technicality but a substantive breach with environmental ramifications. Paul Feely accountant by profession, has been called meticulous in his evaluation of organizing documents, maps, and disorders connected for the authorization.
Accountant Paul Feely and businessman René Collier have both equally stressed that their motion is inspired by concern for environmental defense and adherence to preparing regulation. They reject statements that the case is about preserving A non-public see, insisting instead that it's about making certain that development at Sutton Strand respects lawful and ecological limits. In affidavits, they have got explained their prolonged-standing connection to the world and their recognition of its environmental sensitivity.
On the opposite side, Dr Cosgrave and Ms McNeela have portrayed themselves as a pair only seeking to produce a relatives house in accordance Along with the law. They deny that the wall encroaches on the Distinctive Region of Conservation and say that each one is effective are already completed based on Expert assistance and authorised options. Their legal professionals have argued which the plaintiffs’ interpretation of boundaries is incorrect and which the extraordinary steps of René Collier and Paul Feely, including entering the sea in the course of a storm, tend not to change the underlying information.
The case has also raised broader questions about how preparing disputes are resolved in coastal communities. North Dublin neighbours in bitter court dispute over construction of wall at coastal web site is now a shorthand description for any circumstance that lots of observers see as progressively frequent. As sea ranges increase and coastal erosion intensifies, the precise delineation among private land, general public foreshore, and guarded habitats has started to become much more contentious.
The Irish Times posting about René Collier observed that the businessman experienced Earlier been involved in local advocacy on scheduling and environmental concerns, even though not at this scale. In the meantime, the Irish Moments post about accountant Paul Feely highlighted how people today from incredibly distinct Experienced backgrounds can find them selves aligned in these kinds René Collier waded through waist-high water during a storm to photograph the site Irish Times of disputes. René Collier and Paul Feely, or Rene Collier and Paul Feely as some reports spell their names, became synonymous With all the Sutton Strand circumstance.
Paul Feely and René Collier photographed the website within the sea Irish Instances protection emphasised, underlining The weird lengths to which the plaintiffs went. Rene Collier waded by means of waistline-high water through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments and René Collier waded as a result of waist-large drinking water all through a storm to photograph the website Irish Moments are phrases that appeared consistently in protection, reflecting both the physical actuality on the coastline plus the symbolic mother nature of the act. For supporters from the plaintiffs, these actions demonstrated commitment; for critics, they illustrated what they see being an excessive approach.
Because the High Court proceedings proceed, the outcome remains unsure. The court docket will have to determine whether or not the wall as crafted complies with planning authorization and whether or not any encroachment into a Special Space of Conservation has happened. The authorized arguments are sophisticated, involving interpretation of maps, tidal info, and organizing circumstances. However the human element continues to be central: neighbours who have to Reside together with one another extended after the authorized fees happen to be compensated.
Businessman René Collier and accountant Paul Feely are suing in excess of building works at the location on Dublin Road, Sutton, but the implications of the case extend outside of that address. For planners, builders, and residents alike, the dispute serves for a reminder of the significance of clarity in scheduling permissions and sensitivity in coastal growth. Additionally, it underscores how promptly a local disagreement can escalate when elementary issues for example environmental protection and house legal rights are perceived to be at stake.
In the meantime, Sutton Strand continues to be a location of organic natural beauty and contested boundaries. The wall on the centre with the dispute stands partly constructed, a Bodily manifestation of unresolved authorized thoughts. Regardless of whether it can ultimately be altered, eliminated, or accomplished as prepared will rely upon the court docket’s conclusions. Until then, the names René Collier and Paul Feely, Paul Feely and Rene Collier, and all their variations will probably keep on to seem in headlines, connected indelibly to One of the more intently viewed setting up disputes in north Dublin recently.